March 31, 2004 at 1:32 pm #64371
Their methods have been scoffed at and their claims to be in touch with an afterlife taken with more than a pinch of salt – but a five-year test has shown that mediums can indeed discover your deepest secrets.
Researchers at the Scottish Society for Psychical Research (SSPR) say mediums who took part in their tests beat odds of a million to one to correctly reveal information about volunteer test subjects.
Tricia Robertson, vice-president of the SSPR, a registered charity with around 250 members, said: “We were not trying to prove the existence of the afterlife or that personalities live on, but I think it is now important to recognise that mediumship can honestly gain information that ordinary people can’t.
“I would welcome more academic research into this because it is an area where activity is unexplained as yet.”
A total of 13 mediums took part in the SSPR study, carried out in Scotland and London. In each test the medium would sit in a different room from the participants and choose seat numbers they wanted to read from the audience. The audience, usually around 30 people, would enter a room out of sight of the medium and on their way in be given a random seat number. After the reading, adjudicators would distribute lists of what the mediums had seen and the audience had to tick which of the mediums’ statements applied to them.
The rules of chance would suggest an accuracy rating of 30%, but the mediums’ average was 70%, with some hitting 80% on some of the participants.
“The results were very surprising,” said Robertson. “I have no idea how mediums can gain this information but the results prove that able mediums can accurately read their subjects. Their chances of guessing this level of information about their subjects is a million to one, statistically.
“I am aware that critics will say the tests were somehow rigged. But, rest assured, we could not have been more scientific in the way this was carried out. If anyone claims it is fixed or rigged, we would sue.”
Robertson is due to present her findings, which have been peer reviewed and published in the Journal Of The Society For Psychical Research, at the International Paranormal Conference at Muncaster Castle, Cumbria, this weekend.
Glasgow’s famous “psychic barber” Gordon Smith was one of the mediums who took part in the study. He said: “The conditions were very strict – I had to arrive an hour before the participants and never got to see them. While, for me, it is not essential to be in the same room as the participants, the work is very credible because of those test conditions we were working under.”
Anything to do with the paranormal has become hot property in the last five years – TV schedules are littered with programmes such as UK’s Most Haunted and psychic telephone adverts make up a significant percentage of magazine advertising. The British Astrological And Psychic Society claims that there are more psychics than coal miners in Britain today.
Services such as Star Temple, one of the biggest psychic phoneline providers, employs 50 mediums who conduct 6000 readings a month. More than 95% of callers are women, and in the run up to Valentine’s Day this year they reported a 35% increase in calls.
A survey by Real magazine found that 50% of women had visited a psychic at least once, and a quarter of those said they had made changes to their lives as a result.
Professor Richard Wiseman, a noted psychologist at the University of Hertfordshire who studies the paranormal, said he was unconvinced by the SSPR’s test results.
“It could be true, but testing mediums is notoriously difficult to do well and I’m not entirely convinced that a figure of 80% would be accurate,” he said
“While amateur associations do carry out a lot of research into the paranormal, collating results of this nature is difficult and I would remain sceptical.”
It is true that academic research has been eclipsed by the volume of that done by amateur associations.
Amateur societies like the SSPR are carrying out most of the research into the paranormal because university-funded academic study is very limited.
Also speaking at the Muncaster conference is Dr Hugh Pincott, who believes that one day society will look at the work of amateur investigators with the same respect given to the amateur astronomers of the 15th and 16th centuries who broke ground on discovering new planets and comets.
He said: “There is a large expansion of regional groups who are using their own time and money to carry out research and are making headway. Most academic seats are privately funded and so it really is gifted amateurs who are doing all the work.” 28 March 2004March 31, 2004 at 2:31 pm #94817
I love reading articles like that. :)
This morning I was just thinking about “proof” of mediumship and the people who have a lock on their mind for any proof. They seem to be hard wired not to believe.
I thought of the possibility that they were born without the ability to accept it. They could have made a contract while on the other side to not believe because of some lesson they have to learn here. There may be something missing in their reasoning mind that makes them not believe anything they can’t touch and examine with their own hands.
Just me going through scenarios in my imaginative Gemini mind. :)
GailMarch 31, 2004 at 2:40 pm #94820
“We were not trying to prove the existence of the afterlife or that personalities live on, but I think it is now important to recognise that mediumship can honestly gain information that ordinary people can’t.
Well, that’s a start! :thumbsup:
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.